Shared Hosting Showdown: Hostinger vs Namecheap Speed Tests
Speed matters — whether you're running a blog, an eCommerce store, or a corporate site. In this article, we compare Hostinger vs Namecheap in 2025 based on real-world shared hosting speed tests and benchmarks.
Test Environment
We created identical WordPress websites on Hostinger and Namecheap using their most popular shared hosting plans. Each site used the Astra theme and a standard homepage with images, text, and plugins like Yoast and WPForms. Page load time and TTFB (Time to First Byte) were measured using GTMetrix and WebPageTest.
Speed Results
- Hostinger: Avg. load time – 0.63s; TTFB – 179ms
- Namecheap: Avg. load time – 1.21s; TTFB – 412ms
Hostinger consistently outperformed Namecheap, offering almost double the speed in real-world scenarios.
Technology Behind the Difference
Hostinger leverages LiteSpeed Web Server, an advanced high-performance server optimized for WordPress and static content. Namecheap, by contrast, still uses traditional Apache, which lacks modern caching capabilities without manual tuning.
Global Server Locations
Hostinger offers multiple data centers across North America, Europe, and Asia — meaning lower latency for international visitors. Namecheap hosts most shared servers in the U.S., which could be limiting for global brands.
Conclusion
Hostinger clearly leads the race in shared hosting speed. If performance and page load times are your priority, Hostinger’s infrastructure and LiteSpeed technology provide a noticeable edge over Namecheap in 2025.